What are you evaluating? An AI tool in a classroom An AI-generated claim or headline A local data-center proposal
Reset questions Check a box after discussing a question, even if the answer remains unknown. Checks record your progress, not the quality of the evidence. They reset when you change scenarios or reload. No answers are collected.
Separate a claim from its evidence Write down the specific claim, who made it, the date, and the population or place it concerns. Find the original document. Look for independent evidence and the strongest credible counterargument.
Keep uncertainty visible “Unknown,” “not measured,” and “disputed” are useful findings. A successful demonstration does not establish performance in your setting. An advocacy position or company statement is a perspective to examine.
Questions can change the decision What evidence would change your mind? What would justify a limited trial, further review, or stopping? Who has the authority to decide, and how can affected people be heard?
Read the foundations NIST AI Risk Management Framework ↗ UNESCO education and research guidance ↗ Fairfax planning and public participation ↗ PEC infrastructure advocacy resources ↗
Questions are this hub’s editorial synthesis, not an official assessment or certification. NIST’s framework is voluntary; UNESCO’s guidance is an international educational perspective; PEC is an advocacy organization. Source pages checked October 11, 2026.